Skip to main content

Business as usual

 


It's one of my great regrets that I have always found it far easier to get a job in a corporation in the top three in its sector, than I have been able to get a job in a charity. All of the odds should be in my favour; market leading companies on my CV, experience worth probably hundreds of thousands of pounds, but no success. The loop I've faced is: see, apply, don't get acknowledged/don't get invited to interview.

This is a shame for me because, as must be obvious by now, I'm not greatly motivated by money - I don't want to be a fund manager or a venture capitalist. I'm much more interested in the effects of my work on people.

So in the past week I've put £5 into Trading 212, to deal stocks and shares to see if that's viable as a business, although admittedly the idea leaves me quite cold and so I haven't chosen which shares to buy.

What I'm particularly interested in is business as a lever to improve things; all around us recently we have only seen the exact opposite either by, or for, business. Either things have been run down so that private companies can enjoy a fire sale of assets to turn a profit on (the NHS, for example), or private companies have failed so miserably that what should be something worthy and worthwhile is pretty much ruined (i.e. the railway franchises where the taxpayer will eventually pick up the pieces).

What if we could start a venture that 'made money' out of doing good? The comedian Stewart Lee mused that there are hugely rich comedians, and also comedians such as himself, who have never achieved great financial security, though he also pointed out that if you can get a hardcore of 5,000 fans willing to pay £10 each to see you, that's a nice living. (Which gives me the opportunity to share unquestionably the greatest lead into a gag ever: https://youtu.be/IkI9h7EGYvI
So what if the company doing good made enough for a person, but not huge profit - essentially a lifestyle business?

What if we didn’t sell anything? What if we gave it away and asked people to donate according to what value they thought the venture brought? Trading in coins not being a valid business under my self-imposed rules, I’m going to have a go at the above idea.

Progress this week: I’ve begun getting a transcript together of The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists. Before this coming week’s update, I’m going to pick stock and invest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three Fivers - the idea of spare money

The Covid-19 virus and lockdown have changed things, somewhat. Brexit changed things somewhat. Things will change again, somewhat more. Having worked, over the years, for a number of corporations either American or with strong American influences, the path we are headed down, is strongly American. American colleagues get PTA (paid time off), not holiday. They are guaranteed only 8 days annually - everything else is discretionary. They got into work when they are ill, because labour laws allow arbitrary dismissal. They, by and large, have a ‘side hustle’ going on; a secondary source of income. They quite often have second jobs too. And what has this to do with an obscure blog called “Three Fivers”? The title is a nod to the Three Tenors concert which was huge, way back when, because something popular (football) mixed with something relatively unpopular (opera). I wanted to explore whether it is possible to create money - wealth - from limited means, ten or fifteen poun...

The Runners Up

I once worked with someone who had done some consulting for Richard Branson directly, as opposed to working for one of his companies. He told me of his excitement on the first day of the contract, to be going in to meet the man himself. Being a creative, he was expected to go into his presentation straight after the introductions. His presentation - effectively a pitch - was about a new venture for the company. He began his presentation. Within a minute or two, Richard spoke with an idea - "what if we create a...", that being briefly debated and parked, the presentation continued for 30 seconds. Again, a voice interrupted, "why don't we market a...". And so it went on. Fizzing with ideas, Richard interrupted time and time again. The presentation's impact was lost and the whole experience was a dreadful chore. A while later, the company got back in contact to offer another similarly lucrative contract, complete with a presentation. My acquaintance found that,...

Beginner’s luck

 Three Fivers is predicated upon being able to start a ‘business’ that makes money from just five pounds of investment. Today I could close it down as successful. In my first ever venture into share dealing, I bought £5 worth of Harland and Wolff shares at 4:05pm. At 4:38pm, I offloaded them for a 13p (2.6%) profit. Not enough to pay the mortgage, nor even to qualify as a side hustle, but profit nonetheless. 13p doesn’t buy much these days - not even a Freddo - but, 2.6% profit compounded does add up; my love of a spreadsheet shows how profit becomes more interesting over five days below. Over 12 months (365 days, although you cannot trade for at least 104 of these days) that would turn my humble £5 into around £5300. Not bad. I’m not especially enamoured of share trading, but it can be quite interesting I think if I add in additional rules; devote a maximum of 5 minutes a day to it and invest the whole of the capital at once - no portfolio. Whether this will survive even the next ...